aswritten.ai · public perspective

Perspective › FeedbackLoops

FeedbackLoops

11 nodes in this area of the perspective

This hub gathers the mechanics of how feedback enters and reshapes the product and its knowledge. Two structural loops anchor the space: the [save-memory/PR round semantics] (Position_ReviewMemorySemantics) — save-memory ends a round, merge closes the PR, a corrected review always takes at least two rounds — and the [five-step annotate→document→save→re-annotate cycle] (Observation_FeedbackLoop) where annotation surfaces unsupported claims and re-annotation confirms the shift. [Convergence is framed as asymptotic] (Obs_ConvergenceAsymptotic) accumulation of review evidence, not a binary threshold. On process, the [real-time per-section loop] (Narrative_RealTimeFeedbackLoop) (Mar 19) is held superior to batch review — errors caught before they compound, insights surfaced in the moment. A dense run of Scarlet corrections (Mar 19) sharpens product framing: [expertise on-demand not ambient] (Obs_AmbientBehaviorCorrection), [perspective vs local RAG] (Obs_CustomGPTCorrection), [expanding experts not replacing] (Obs_ExpertReachCorrection), and [Tinkerer's existing solution as barrier] (Obs_TinkererBarrierCorrection). Later signals: [text-for-topic precedent] (Obs_ScarletTextForTopicQuote) (Apr 8) as rationale for the research branch methodology, and [feedback/help tool as churn prevention] (Obs_FeedbackHelpQuote) (Mar 26). [Open rhetorical questions] (StyleObs_OpenQuestions) surface unresolved design decisions as bounded scopes.

Witness phrases

verbatim
The product behavior is expertise at the moment of need, not ambient
verbatim
Custom GPTs don't provide perspective — they're just local RAG
verbatim
We're not replacing experts — we're expanding their reach
verbatim
The Tinkerer doesn't activate fastest — their existing solution is a barrier
verbatim
This feels like a similar moment to the text for topic moment
verbatim
Five-step feedback loop: annotate surfaces unsupported claims → agent offers to document → user provides knowledge → memory saved, extraction runs → re-annotate confirms shift.
verbatim
Correction 7: Save memory = corrections exist, ends round, PR updates. Merge = no corrections needed, closes PR. A review with corrections always takes at least two rounds.
verbatim
Real-time per-section feedback is held superior to batch review, but the asymptotic convergence framing implies no session fully closes — these two sit in tension about what 'done' means.
verbatim
Tinkerer archetype corrected from 'fastest activator' to 'barrier case' — a prior hypothesis about adoption sequence was reversed by Scarlet's feedback, not refined.
verbatim
Feedback/help tool framed as churn prevention (operational/retention lens) sits apart from the epistemic feedback loops that dominate the hub — a different register of 'feedback.'
verbatim
Open Questions as bounded rhetorical scopes is a structural/stylistic observation about how unresolved decisions surface — distinct from the process loops and product corrections elsewhere in the hub.

In this area

Narrative_RealTimeFeedbackLoop
Real-Time Feedback Loop: Read and React as Each Section Is Written
Observation Obs_AmbientBehaviorCorrection
Scarlet's correction establishing the on-demand vs. ambient distinction for product behavior.
Observation Obs_ConvergenceAsymptotic
Convergence is asymptotic accumulation of review evidence, not a binary threshold. More honest to how organizational knowledge actually works.
Observation Obs_CustomGPTCorrection
Scarlet's correction distinguishing Custom GPTs from aswritten's perspective-based approach.
Observation Obs_ExpertReachCorrection
Scarlet's correction reframing the expert relationship — expansion not replacement.
Observation Obs_FeedbackHelpQuote
Feedback/help tool as primary churn-prevention mechanism
Observation Obs_ScarletTextForTopicQuote
Scarlet's verbatim articulation of the text-for-topic precedent and the canon-too-soon drift mechanism — the founding rationale for the research branch methodology.
Observation Obs_TinkererBarrierCorrection
Scarlet's correction to the AI's hypothesis about the Tinkerer archetype — their existing solution is a barrier, not an accelerant to adoption.
Observation Observation_FeedbackLoop
Five-step feedback loop: annotate surfaces unsupported claims → agent offers to document → user provides knowledge → memory saved, extraction runs → re-annotate confirms shift.
StyleObservation StyleObs_OpenQuestions
Open Questions section uses direct rhetorical questions to surface unresolved design decisions — each question is a bounded scope

1 further node is not published in the public projection. Each node links from the entity index.