The process architecture has evolved from a singular focus on [correcting foundational misunderstandings] (Narrative_CorrectBeforeBuilding) toward a more structured, multi-pass operational framework. The current trajectory emphasizes the [Two-Pass ARB Pattern] (Narrative_Phase1Phase2Pattern), which bifurcates work into exploratory and finalization phases to manage the lag between intent and execution. This is supported by an [iterative review process] (Narrative_ReviewProcess) that prioritizes baseline stability and explicit intent labeling. Crucially, the system distinguishes between review mechanisms and automated side effects; [notifications are treated as post-commit transactions] (Position_NotificationTransactionSideEffect) that operate independently of the review flow. To maintain velocity, [review instructions are explicitly non-blocking] (Position_ReviewInstructionsNotBlocking), ensuring that users can decline review and continue work without systemic friction.
Witness phrases
verbatim Foundational misunderstandings must be corrected before any building begins
verbatim ARB sessions work in two passes: Phase 1 (exploratory) and Phase 2 (finalization).
verbatim Notification is a transaction side effect, not a review mechanism.
verbatim Review is strongly offered, not mandatory.
verbatim The tension between mandatory review for quality and non-blocking review for velocity remains a central design constraint.
In this area
NarrativeNarrative_CorrectBeforeBuilding Foundational misunderstandings must be corrected before any building begins
NarrativeNarrative_Phase1Phase2Pattern The Two-Pass ARB Pattern
NarrativeNarrative_ReviewProcess Iterative review process design requires establishing baseline before introducing shifts, labeling intent explicitly, and managing scale through chunked comparisons.
2 further nodes are not published in the public projection. Each node links from the entity index.